RESUMO
Insulin is proved to have angiogenic ability thereby may worsen the diabetic retinopathy (DR) progression. Insulin also triggers the expression of endogenous angiogenic peptide, apelin. Since protamine was introduced as an inhibitor of the apelin receptor, we hypothesized that use of protaminated insulin instead of non-protaminated insulin can decrease the negative role of insulin in progression of DR. Firstly, the incidence of DR was compared among three diabetic patient groups: an oral medication, non-protaminated insulin, and protaminated insulin (PIns). Proliferation and migration rate of HUVECs was measured after insulin, apelin, and protamine exposure. In clinical study, the chance of developing DR was 8.5 and 4.1 times higher in insulin group and PIns groups compared with oral group respectively. Insulin group had a chance of 9.5-folds of non-proliferative DR compared to oral group. However, the difference of non-proliferative DR between PIns and oral group wasn't significant. In-vitro tests showed that concomitant use of insulin and apelin increases viability and migratory potential of HUVECs. However, protamine could reverse this effect. Protamine present in some insulins might show a promising protective role against diabetic retinopathy. Thus, protaminated insulins may be preferable in the treatment of diabetes.
